Birmingham City Council are facing what the Council leader recently described as 'the end of local government as we know it'. Here's my response to BCC's consultation on their 2012-13 budget. You can see the proposals, and respond too, at: http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/budgetviews
To whom it may concern:
I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond through the Budget Consultation 
process, and I hope many other Birmingham citizens have also done so.
My response is largely around the general principles (what you call ‘the 
wider service delivery issues’ in the document) rather than the particularities 
of individual budget lines.
I’m sure cliches have already been over-used in this conversation, but I’m 
afraid the cliche that springs to mind is about ‘rearranging deckchairs on the 
Titanic’. It is becoming increasingly clear that the figures, projected into the 
future, mean not only that so-called ‘salami slicing’ of services is an 
ineffective response, but even that an approach that ‘preserves’ some services 
while cutting others will not be going far enough. Albert Bore’s description of 
‘the end of local government as we know it’ is correct, and what is needed is a 
radically different approach to local government. Rather than ‘restructuring the 
building’, I would suggest, what is needed, unavoidably, is to begin the work of 
imagining what might be built, what seeds planted and nurtured, in the rubble 
that is left behind.
1) Who will be able to think the unthinkable?
I would humbly suggest that those best-equipped to do this imagining might 
include some council members and officers with an ability to think far enough 
‘outside the box’, but that the pressures of working within the current system 
may well mean that many will find that just too difficult. Those of us who work 
in what is often called the ‘Third’ (and sometimes, more recently, the ‘Tired’) 
Sector have, I would suggest, a wealth of experience not simply in surviving on 
a shoestring, but on the kind of creative reinvention that is needed for 
Birmingham.
My first suggestion, then, would be an urgent need, not for another 
consultation exercise, or polite listening, but for getting the right 
people in rooms, together, with a blank sheet of paper, across all the areas and 
departments in which the Council currently provides, or aspires to provide, some 
kind of service – to re-imagine what kind of support will be needed for 
Birmingham to survive, and ideally thrive. As a concrete example, I would want 
to highlight the work of the Chamberlain Forum as being ideally placed to enable 
such thinking to happen and develop.
2) A radical approach that starts with neighbourhoods
The traditional model of ‘service provision’ is almost dead. That will, 
inevitably, mean huge losses, both in terms of council employees but also in 
terms of what local neighbourhoods will no longer benefit from. I would suggest, 
however, that in the crisis there is also an opportunity, and it is an 
opportunity to rediscover ourselves as a city, begin with our local 
neighbourhoods. There are many things that are ‘provided’ as ‘services’ that 
neighbourhoods are actually, with adequate resourcing, much better at doing 
themselves. There is clear evidence, for example, that the most significant 
factors that make people feel safe and secure is not police presence, but the 
levels of trust between neighbours, and the frequency with which people in a 
neighbourhood gather together outdoors. There is also clear evidence that the 
wellbeing of the most vulnerable people – children & young people, older 
people, and adults in between – is maximised not within institutions, but within 
communities of mutual care.
What I’m suggesting here is not ‘big society’ – a policy that looks for all 
the world like a smokescreen for massive cuts in public services, with nothing 
positive to replace them apart from some patronising moral exhortations 
emanating from comfortable Oxfordshire villages. It is also not simply about 
‘devolving to District Committees’, as if that somehow solves anything – merely 
displacing the same old problems to a lower level on the chain (something that 
central government have been doing very ‘successfully’ themselves, as Birmingham 
can testify).
What I am suggesting needs resourcing. But it needs a kind of resourcing 
that is utterly different from ‘service provision’. It also, helpfully, can be 
done very effectively with rather less money. It is not about ‘neighbourhood 
management’, although that was a very good initiative in this direction. There 
will, after all, be rather less services for communities to manage or 
commission. This is about community development. Paid people, in each 
local neighbourhood (and ‘local’ means ‘local’ here – if it’s not within walking 
distance, it’s not ‘local’) of the city, who are trained and skilled in 
connecting people, building relationships, growing trust, nurturing friendships, 
drawing out people’s skills and confidence and knowledge and passions. It is, as 
the Social Cohesion Inquiry has at least begun to realise about identifying, 
unlocking, and connecting the ‘assets’ within people and communities so often 
labelled in ‘deficit’ terms – but using them to grow things from the grassroots, 
not to support a creaking, disintegrating, top-down structure.
Again, it is often the 3rd Sector that knows better than most how to do 
this. But even ‘we’ are often so tied in to the ‘service provision’ mentality 
that we fail to do what needs doing most.
Yes, Birmingham needs infrastructure, and it would be easy and obvious for 
the City Council to focus on that. But Birmingham needs strong, resilient and 
caring communities more. If we’re asking the hardest questions about what BCC 
spends its money on, I would argue this has to come first, before anything else 
– because everything else will flow from this. BCC is in the best possible 
position to commission the recruitment, training, and support of such a network 
of community developers – and it will pay dividends. The evidence from a 
programme such as ‘Near Neighbours’ in significant sections of the city would 
back this up.
There is, of course, an ‘equality’ question in all of this. Clearly some 
neighbourhoods will need more ‘intense’ work, others will require a ‘lighter 
touch’. There are measures around that will help with that judgement, but they 
may not be the traditional ‘deprivation’ indices. Levels of social capital, 
social infrastructure, and formal/informal co-production (again, see Chamberlain 
Forum’s work in this area) will be the key indicators.
3) Relationship with central government
As an outsider to the workings of ‘government’, I can only imagine what 
goes on behind the scenes in the relationship between local and central 
government. I would suggest, however, that we are again moving into radically 
new terrain in that relationship. While central government slashes and burns 
local government’s powers and budget (especially in authorities like Birmingham, 
particularly dependent on central funding), ‘responsibility’ (for picking up the 
pieces) is devolved to local level like never before.
It must surely be time for cities like Birmingham to find creative ways to 
vocally and powerfully resist the central government agenda and its impact on 
our communities, especially where it hits the poorest and most vulnerable. It 
may be an uncomfortable alliance, but I would suggest Birmingham City Council 
might find a whole new strength in forging links with groups as diverse as 
Citizens UK and UK Uncut, to make the people power of Birmingham known in the 
corridors of Westminster.
In conclusion, I appreciate these may well be answers to questions that you 
haven’t quite been asking, and that as answers go they may be either beyond what 
feels currently imaginable, or too vague to be of use. Whatever happens, please 
have the courage to not allow the vested interests and impoverished imaginations 
of those who wish to preserve their own small patch of ‘status quo’ to, if not 
win the day, at least paralyse any possibility of meaningful action. The ship is 
sinking, and we need to be hard at work making the best possible 
lifeboats.
With warmest wishes,
Revd Al 
Barrett
Church of 
England Priest, Hodge Hill Church
(St Philip & St James C of E in partnership with Hodge Hill URC)
"Growing Loving Community... in the love of God ♥ with all our neighbours ♥ across Hodge Hill"
(St Philip & St James C of E in partnership with Hodge Hill URC)
"Growing Loving Community... in the love of God ♥ with all our neighbours ♥ across Hodge Hill"
 
